4 ms·
In these threads it feels like you are not reading what they are saying, or at least reading it in the least charitable way. Defensive driving simply means to
by Cogito 6y ago
In these threads it feels like you are not reading what they are saying, or at least reading it in the least charitable way.
Defensive driving simply means to not assume drivers are going to take an action until they give evidence of it.
If a driver is going to stop at an intersection, they will slow down before they get to the intersection. A defensive driver approaching a crossing with other cars approaching will look for evidence that the other cars are slowing down before assuming that they will stop.
If a car is stopped at a pedestrian crossing and a defensive pedestrian is looking to cross, they will look for evidence the car is about to accelerate into the crossing. They don't assume the car will suddenly accelerate for no reason, because there is no evidence that they would! Evidence that they may suddenly accelerate includes things like looking down at their phone, or not looking at pedestrians. If the defensive pedestrian sees that evidence they approach the crossing with caution, ready to take evasive action or not enter the crossing if needed.
Right-of-way tells everyone who has the right of way, it makes the expected behaviour clear. Assuming that everyone else will do what you expect them to do is extremely dangerous, as even without malice or carelessness it's very easy for each invloved party to have different assumptions about the expected bahviour.
So, to be defensive it's important to
- have a well informed understanding of what you think should happen
- look for evidence that all parties are acting in accordance with what you think should happen
- be prepared to change your actions if any party does not act in accordance with what you think should happen
- renewiltord 6y agoI think it's quite clear. These threads mostly involve people acting like they're better drivers than they are and claiming behaviour they do not practise. Then they'll come here and act a bit sanctimonious "Why didn't the X just do Y? I always do Y". It's just the Wobegon Effect in action. I don't read it charitably because of the sanctimony involved in not reading an accident situation with the Understanding Human Error strategy, thereby leading to a bunch of low-quality comments about how people should just be better, involving poor understanding of public health and traffic engineering principles. It's true, I probably shouldn't engage when the nth accident analysis by a HNer is "Why didn't the pilot just not crash into the mountain? When I see a mountain I just avoid crashing into it". No one is likely to get anything from that.
- imtringued 6y agoIt's plain hindsight. Everything becomes obvious after you have had enough time to analyze the situation.