3 ms·
Regarding #4, with the ubiquity of call blocking, I don't see how it is possible for them to reach 90% of the people that may have been exposed, especially once
by hardtke 6y ago
Regarding #4, with the ubiquity of call blocking, I don't see how it is possible for them to reach 90% of the people that may have been exposed, especially once people find out that picking up that phone call means you will be in quarantine. To make matters worse, the authorities likely won't be able to tell you where/when you were exposed and to whom (medical privacy). This target is basically unreachable IMHO.
- mindslight 6y agoThere are more ways to contact people than just calling them. Your comment stinks of why we can't get anything done these days - it starts with an assumption of failure, and argues for giving up based on it.
- SpicyLemonZest 6y agoA round number repeated for 4 metrics in a row is never really meant to be taken seriously. If it turns out that they can only reach 80% of contacts, they'll adjust the plan to account for that - nobody's going to let it be the one factor that keeps restrictions from being loosened.
- stallmanite 6y agoI guess this is another reason something should have been done about the spam calls. Who answers the phone now for an unknown number?