You can't rob a word of its meaning. If it encompass to much, you can create a new one or be more precise. Anyway, i think the point of this article is that pe

You can't rob a word of its meaning. If it encompass to much, you can create a new one or be more precise. Anyway, i think the point of this article is that people that are not scientists themselves can debate with each other, but should avoid perturbing (i'd say polluting even) the scientific debate, whether its by disparaging an adversarial opinion or but elevating a scientits too high (see what has happened with the pr Raoult cult in France). This is too much noise and scientist are people too.