3 ms·
It's more the claim to have designed the challenges. I was excited to read them, and then heavily disappointed to just have a short list of stock, well-known id
by pbhjpbhj 7y ago
It's more the claim to have designed the challenges. I was excited to read them, and then heavily disappointed to just have a short list of stock, well-known ideas.
Take spaghetti-bridges, what exactly did Dyson _engineers_ design there? To meet the title, IMO, they'd need to have tested different novel design ideas, chosen design aspects, and extended those aspects.
Cheap marketing looks cheap.
I look forward to being contradicted, whereby Dyson engineers share their notebook pages on how they designed these challenges ...
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- rexpop 7y agoOf course, I agree with you that it's dishonest. It's the typical dishonesty of marketing. All marketing is dishonest. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you can't trust marketing. You can't trust corporations, and you can't trust marketing.