3 ms·
The emphasis on complete is a new take. The entire idea of an MVP encapsulates the idea that it will change into something in the future. Just changing the me
by kasey_junk 7y ago
The emphasis on complete is a new take. The entire idea of an MVP encapsulates the idea that it will change into something in the future.
Just changing the mental goal to something that can live on its own with no further development is an important difference. Does it need a new acronym? I don’t know but I never liked MVP anyway.
- mikeg8 7y agoThe reason shooting for completeness is not ideal is because it’s usually a waste of time. Very rarely can founders guess the compete solution to their customers problem out of the gate. It’s the mismatch between what the company imagines the complete solution should look like versus integrating customer feedback to make “complete” solution more people will pay for.