Is it me or does the situation get kind of odd when you're looking for multiple asymmetries to explain the disparity? If there's multiple contributing, are the

Is it me or does the situation get kind of odd when you're looking for multiple asymmetries to explain the disparity? If there's multiple contributing, are they all in the same direction? If so, why becomes an even bigger question than we started with, right? Then we need a way to explain the asymmetry in the asymmetries. If that's not it, and it's a mix of asymmetries, some going one way some the other, how does that on the whole end up giving us a large asymmetry one way? It almost seems like you'd need one big asymmetry that's doing the real heavy-lifting and the rest are just noise. Otherwise wouldn't you tend towards zero as you add more asymmetries with uncorrelated directions?