4 ms·

Thanks, but the issue with the modular, ad-hoc approach is that you need to do a lot of integration and leg work before you get to the domain problem in hand an

Thanks, but the issue with the modular, ad-hoc approach is that you need to do a lot of integration and leg work before you get to the domain problem in hand and you'll need to maintain those integrations going forward.

lioeters 7y ago
I agree, and that might be the most valuable thing about frameworks like Meteor. It provides a curated developer experience, where most of these common features and integrations are solved. They tend to have far superior documentation than any ad-hoc approach, making it more suitable for teams. And a whole community that continues to debug, improve, and maintain it. Well, I'm with you in the search for such a framework!
- SparkyMcUnicorn 7y ago
  FeathersJS + Nuxt/Next (or any front end you want) has been a good combo for me. Meteor always had a blocking issue for me every time I'd try to use it.
  - aogaili 7y ago
    I like FeatherJS as well. What kind of blocking issues? you mean getting it to run?
    - SparkyMcUnicorn 7y ago
      Usually it was a feature I wanted to use that was broken. It's been a while, so I forget specifics. Requiring mongodb was another factor a few times as well. This was before Mongo had ACID transactions or any built-in options to save immediately to disk.