4 ms·
That's a bit too generous. Their primary concern when reading the article was, "too much fear mongering". I don't assume they were malicious so much as detached
by shirakawasuna 7y ago
That's a bit too generous. Their primary concern when reading the article was, "too much fear mongering". I don't assume they were malicious so much as detached and overlooking things that they shouldn't.
"It's a War Zone" is incorrect, but "As more of them die" is not. The former is a dumb metaphor, the latter is just a correct description.
Given worker conditions, it is plain that they are being put at unnecessary risks and that these risks are fundamentally exploitative - folks have to either put their lives at risk for corporate profits (no PPE provided, frequently) or potentially become homeless, lose their insurance during a pandemic, etc. Estimating the numbers is something to go do, sure, but it doesn't change the dangerous material conditions on the ground and the dark nature of our response. Look at who bears the burden and why they do it.
- 40four 7y agoIt has to be incredibly stressful. I wonder what's going through workers heads every time I see them while I shop. As you said, many are between a rock and a hard place. The high school/ college kids still living at home not as much. But the adults, and the many retirement age people you see working at grocery stores don't have that luxury. Keep going into a risky work environment and scraping by, or quit and try to wait your turn in the infinite unemployment line. Depending on location, who knows how long it would be before benefits are paid. Very sad...