5 ms·
I actually agree with most of what you’re saying. Anti-cheats like BattlEye or EasyAntiCheat rely on advanced obfuscation like virtualization to protect their
by invokestatic 6y ago
I actually agree with most of what you’re saying. Anti-cheats like BattlEye or EasyAntiCheat rely on advanced obfuscation like virtualization to protect their secrets. But people are now deobfuscating those, revealing exactly how the anti-cheat works, allowing cheaters to evade it.
I take a fundamentally different, “zero trust” approach and built my anti-cheat with the assumption that it has already been fully reverse-engineered and figured out. I think if your software relies on security by obscurity you’ve already lost.
- indigochill 6y agoMy curiosity is piqued. Is there somewhere I can learn more about your solution? Even if just a product page.
- invokestatic 6y agoI guess so, I didn't want to use this as a promotional opportunity since I think it would make my comments insincere. But if your interested, https://h6ntechnologies.com/ https://h6ntechnologies.com/.
- indigochill 6y agoYeah, I appreciate that. It just turns out my team's looking at integrating anti-cheat in the very near future so I happen to be in the market (and feeling lukewarm about EAC and BattlEye), and it's a topic of personal interest besides. So thanks!
- solarkraft 6y ago> with the assumption that it has already been fully reverse-engineered and figured out Then how do you prevent it from being circumvented?