4 ms·
Good. Make it EXPENSIVE and thus purge it from the web.
by pmlnr 7y ago
Good. Make it EXPENSIVE and thus purge it from the web.
- c0inster 7y agoAgreed. I hate it. Luckily they is a way around it: https://github.com/dessant/buster https://github.com/dessant/buster
- IshKebab 7y agoThat doesn't seem like a way around the problem of how to identify bots without pissing off humans. If anything it will make it worse!
- pmlnr 7y agoYou don't. Bots will always be present, always one step ahead. Honestl, why bother?
- IshKebab 7y agoBecause people don't like spam?
- c0inster 7y agoYou'll always get spam, email for example. You're not required to solve a stupid task before sending it. The recievers mail client can filter basic spam from real mails. Yes, there are false positives and you'll have to look in the spam folder. But you will do it carefully, not get phished that easily and see no sketchy pill ads. Bots and spam will always exist and training googles AI to detect stop signs won't change that.
- skrebbel 7y agoHow do you propose to solve the problem Captchas are designed to solve, if not through Captchas?
- dredmorbius 7y agoThe question is more one of whom to trust than of telling humans from computers. That remains a Hard Problem.