7 ms·
You know those signs we memed the hell out of last decade? They're so cliched that they don't mean anything anymore, but think of those. Keep calm and carr
by hoorayimhelping 7y ago
You know those signs we memed the hell out of last decade? They're so cliched that they don't mean anything anymore, but think of those.
Keep calm and carry on
You should relax. We're not the first humans to see some hardship. Everything isn't going to fall apart because the economy has a downturn. Society isn't going to collapse because of this. It didn't happen in the 1600s, nor the 1700s, nor the 1800s, nor the 1900s. It's not going to happen in the 2000s.
Two global wars, the use of nuclear weapons, and a 50 year cold war with the ever present threat of nuclear apocalypse didn't cause society to break down last century, a flu won't cause it to fall apart this century either.
- baron_harkonnen 7y ago> Keep calm and carry on You know that that meme originated from a campaign designed by the British government for motivation in the face of mass bombing anticipated in England before the onset of WWII right? I think saying that "this won't be any worse than being bombed by nazis" is not a particularly motivated slogan. > a flu won't cause it to fall apart this century either. If you think this is just a freak thing that is happening, som e flu what will pass, then you don't understand what is happening. What we're seeing is the way this pandemic is exposing vulnerabilities in our global capitalist system. And finally, plenty of societies of collapse in those time periods. Of course humans and societies continue to exist, but there are more an enough examples of societies that have ceases to exist and the transition is a painful process.
- ubercow13 7y agoIt's actually way more ironic than that. It's traced back to the public stance of the British government during the spanish flu pandemic in WW1, where they decided that keeping the economy going was more important than trying to slow the spread of the flu. "According to Dr Honigsbaum, the “carry on” advice may well have been responsible for thousands of the 250,000 Britons who ultimately died in the Spanish flu pandemic." https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/body/coronavirus-spanish-flu-dark-history-keep-calm-carry-advice/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/body/coronavirus-...
- airstrike 7y agoThe irony is almost palpable! Thank you for sharing this.
- 7777fps 7y agoThis isn't a flu. Stop repeating misinformation.
- meddlepal 7y agoYou know what he means, don't be pedantic.
- 7777fps 7y agoIt's not pedantic, a lot of people will die because people were saying, "It's just a flu" and not properly preparing or isolating.
- meddlepal 7y agoContext and audience matter. If you're getting up in front of a bunch of people and advising them that it's "just like the Flu" you're doing damage. If you're invoking the flu as a parallel for illustrative purposes with an informed audience then it's pedantic to call it out.
- 7777fps 7y ago1. HN is not "an informed audience", it's literally the public. And it's common for software developers to mistake themselves for domain experts on any domain but they aren't. 2. It's not an informed audience if misinformation is not challenged, it's a misinformed audience. 3. The flu is a bad parallel. The flu, while annually killing lots of people, does not overwhelm hospitals like a novel virus does. At best it makes people think this is like swine flu, while it has quickly shown to be nothing like swine flu.
- s1artibartfast 7y agoRegarding 3, upper estimates for the 2009 swine flu are north of 500k deaths and the 1918 Spanish flu is 50 million. Flus can be very deadly and the poster obviously did not intend to use the word in a diminutive way. You added that interpretation, knowing it is wrong, and then challenged it.
- GuiA 7y agoI agree with you, but still would like to point out that the same line of argument (we’ve been fine before) would be as valid if society were to actually collapse. No species has ever gone extinct before... until it does!
- jasonv 7y agoSo you're saying -- if things now return to conditions that were present during "Two global wars, the use of nuclear weapons" of last century... no cause for alarm?
- closeparen 7y agoCivilization can withstand alarming situations.
- jasonv 7y agoCivilization can; personally... I'm somewhat concerned about my next (and possibly last) 20-30 years.
- digitaltrees 7y agoWhile all of that is true, it can be very painful for most people. These types of events almost invariably lead to social unrest which compounds the problem. Ambitious and unscrupulous leaders in government and businesses will use this to undermine many of the norms we take for granted. What is clear is that people are underestimating this crisis, no one wants to think we are in a WWII level moment, and so we don’t activate the appropriate level of response. But it is and will be a world altering period. Once consistent pattern is that countries seem to feel like you do, it’s just a flu, then doctors see patients gasping for breath and literally drowning as their lungs fill up with fluid, and the true dread sets in. My friend is a doctor in NYC. She said this feels like war, and the nature of death experienced by people is horrific. If people were bleeding from their eyeballs like a movie maybe that would capture people’s attention but on the front lines people are terrified because this is an awful awful way to die.
- skrtskrt 7y agoHopefully we have the chance to undermine the horrific norm of employer-based private healthcare in the US