5 ms·
How will it still be available and what underlying software work in Asterisk is being referred to? Based on the given situation, the museum won't own the calle
by rob-olmos 7y ago
How will it still be available and what underlying software work in Asterisk is being referred to?
Based on the given situation, the museum won't own the caller's cell phone number that they're trying to legitimately spoof for their staff's cell phone.
- skrtskrt 7y agoYou've reached the limit of my knowledge here regarding implementation details :) Asterisk is an open-source PBX system. I think the original call will come in with the correct STIR/SHAKEN-validated SIP headers and the PBX can forward them as is, see some discussion here: https://community.freepbx.org/t/stop-robocalls-act/60921/5 https://community.freepbx.org/t/stop-robocalls-act/60921/5 I previously worked at a telecom software company, and I know everyone with their shit together has been preparing for this for a long time, which is why I'm not concerned that these common cases should continue working. These softwares are often built on top of or on a branch of Freeswitch/Asterisk.
- phs2501 7y agoGood to know; I admit I haven't looked at the technical side of this. Mostly I was just providing my "legit" use case for wanting to spoof numbers since I think a lot of times most people don't realize they exist.
- rob-olmos 7y agoInteresting. I did not think of the potential case that Asterisk could forward the STIR signature forward. Thanks!