3 ms·
None of the WebRTC based options just work, they're all glitchy and cannot scale up to even moderate amounts of users. We have Google Hangouts Meet for free for
by Saaster 7y ago
None of the WebRTC based options just work, they're all glitchy and cannot scale up to even moderate amounts of users. We have Google Hangouts Meet for free for our org, and we still pay for Zoom because It Just Works.
- x0x0 7y agoYeah. And high fidelity sync between audio (ideally via phone). Maybe someone does it, but we tried _all_ vendors and settled on Zoom. And screen annotations, and the ability to remember participants' phones and dial them directly (replaces them having to type 9 digit numbers into their phones), etc. Also, Zoom has reached a critical mass where, particularly for sales calls, the remote party is quite likely to have it installed. The network effect here is really valuable.
- bwb 7y agoSame here, we used hangouts for the longest time but it got worse. Zoom just works perfectly all the time.
- basch 7y agoEven having the "unblock this site from camera and microphone" burried in the browser chrome or settings pages somewhere is a dealbreaker. It's too easy for people to mindlessly click "no" to can this access your microphone, because of the way the browser pops it up during first use, instead of during "install."
- noahtallen 7y agoTrue. Even the adblocker and autoplay blockers can prevent video and audio from working in Hangouts. I have had issues with hangouts when joining meetings with important people — and my browser’s autoplay block feature prevented the video feed from working.
- benhurmarcel 7y agoMaybe it has to do with the plan you have? I've used Google Meet with up to ~150 participants and it was fine, but we have an Enterprise account.