3 ms·
...use the hammer that didn't arbitrarily break compatibility, then? (Note that the original analogy pointed out that they couldn't be mixed, anyway: "or even t
by kick 7y ago
...use the hammer that didn't arbitrarily break compatibility, then? (Note that the original analogy pointed out that they couldn't be mixed, anyway: "or even take advantage of the nails you've hit!")
This is like complaining that the well is poisoned when you're the one who put arsenic in it.
This also isn't even an open source project, so it's not like you can mix and match anyway.
- Dylan16807 7y agoI didn't make python 3, and "stick on python 2 forever" doesn't seem like the solution here as far as I can tell. > This also isn't even an open source project, so it's not like you can mix and match anyway. Again focusing on the execution of one specific project, as-is, is beside the point of "get everyone on the same hammer".
- kick 7y agoI didn't make python 3 No, but you're complaining about a person using Python 2, the one that didn't arbitrarily break compatibility, while promoting the use of Python 3 because not being compatible is bad. Again focusing on the execution of one specific project, as-is, is beside the point of "get everyone on the same hammer". I agree with this.