> The reason is that raising equity dilutes all current shareholders. But like venture funding, dilution is fine as long as it means that the company survives

> The reason is that raising equity dilutes all current shareholders. But like venture funding, dilution is fine as long as it means that the company survives or grows. I'd rather own 1% of a billion dollar company than 10% of a dead one. > It's a bigger "loss" to them than a termed interest loan which the tax payer gets minimal reward for taking on the risk. Yes, I agree, but my key point is that buybacks are a natural part of equity markets and are not done solely to "manipulate the market" as commonly claimed. > I say, that any bailout loans _should_ come with an equity dilution component. Tax payers should get compensated, or this moral hazard will just continue into the future. Agreed, any exceptional bailouts through the government should come with an equity stake. I'm fine with lending to airlines at normal corporate lending rates without needing any additional compensation, though.