3 ms·
Divided by distance^2 - looks inverted exponential to me. It does apply to spooled batteries, which is pretty much most modern batteries but most importantly L
by ricw 7y ago
Divided by distance^2 - looks inverted exponential to me.
It does apply to spooled batteries, which is pretty much most modern batteries but most importantly Li-ion batteries
- thfuran 7y agoWhat you've linked has essentially nothing to do with the discussion. What the person who replied to you thought you were talking about was the equation for energy stored in a capacitor, which is proportional to inverse of distance.
- ricw 7y agoIt absolutely has. It’s basic physics and it definitely applies to batteries or in fact any static charges, which is what is being discussed.
- nitrogen 7y agoI'm not a physicist, but my understanding is that batteries do not use the electric field at all to store charge, unlike a capacitor. Batteries use chemical reactions to move electrons, not static electric charge.
- klyrs 7y ago> Divided by distance^2 - looks inverted exponential to me. As stated in the Wikipedia article you linked to, that's an inverse-square law. That's a far cry from inverse-exponential.
- adwn 7y ago> Divided by distance^2 - looks inverted exponential to me. Quadratic growth is very, very different from exponential growth – both from a theoretical as well as a practical perspective.
- marcosdumay 7y agoThe force is proportional to distance^-2, the resulting energy is proportional to distance^-1.