4 ms·
My point is that the actual risk to life and limb from this attack is very low because in the vast majority of situations you can easily and safely get off the
by caconym_ 7y ago
My point is that the actual risk to life and limb from this attack is very low because in the vast majority of situations you can easily and safely get off the road without instruments, and indeed that's exactly what you should do if your instruments fail. If you think that point is out of context where I wrote it, then we will have to agree to disagree.
- Dylan16807 7y agoWhat? I don't understand how this is relevant at all to my post. Why do you think I am calling something out of context? What do you think we disagree about? You need to explain what you think I said, because I have no idea if it's something I actually said. Let me summarize my point of view again, very simply: You are allied with userbinator in saying that it is not "perfectly safe and drivable", despite the quibbles about exactly how it fails that test. Especially because you're saying "It's safe assuming you won't keep driving it." and they're saying "If you keep driving it, it's not safe.", and both of those can easily be true at the same time.
- erikpukinskis 7y agoI would have no trouble safely driving a car without instruments. My only concern would be getting a speeding ticket, but I wouldn’t have trouble driving safely.