3 ms·

Why would "bioterrorism scale" & "pandemic scale" be different, especially if a bioterror agent was crafted to be contagious (& thus create pandemic conditions)

• marcosdumay 7y ago
  Just to add, but why would a bioterror agent not be crafted to be contagious? Spread is the big differential on bioterror, and most other forms of terrorism do not require a team with members that have 2 PHDs each.
• smacktoward 7y ago
  A bioterrorist cell would not have the resources to craft a perfectly engineered biological weapon. They'd be more likely to have access to limited quantities of some pre-existing biological agent (like anthrax, say). So what you'd see in that scenario is attacks that cause a bunch of casualties in a few locations in one big splash, and then quickly peter out after that. It's like, what's the difference between a terrorist nuclear attack and a full-scale nuclear war? In the former scenario, you're talking a small number of low-yield devices triggered in one country; the rest of the world still stands able to provide assistance. In the latter scenario, there's nobody left to help who hasn't also been blown to ashes.
  • dillonmckay 7y ago
    I think you would re-evaluate this reasoning after watching the show ‘Jericho’. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jericho_(2006_TV_series) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jericho_(2006_TV_series)