2 ms·
Be that as it may, it's still way too expensive to be of use when treating millions of patients, even if the necessary quantities could be quickly produced, whi
by m0zg 7y ago
Be that as it may, it's still way too expensive to be of use when treating millions of patients, even if the necessary quantities could be quickly produced, which they can not.
- hcknwscommenter 7y ago~10K for an effective single-dose treatment is not that expensive. Admittedly this is a very crude calculation, but it's probably not too far off. Moreover, mAb production is a very mature technology, that can be scaled up by just growing more cells. I'm not saying we are close to getting this into the clinic, but it is a very interesting result.
- m0zg 7y agoAcross 100M people that's a cool trillion dollars.
- newsbinator 7y agoTrue, but even if we're only talking dollars, we'd have to compare that trillion to the economic amount lost by not inoculating.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- imtringued 7y agoThere would be a lot of dead people but the economic impact of those deaths would be pretty insignificant because highest fatality rate is for people in their 80s.
- op00to 7y agoI think you underestimate the psycho-social effects of having millions of deaths.
- saystupidthings 7y agoAnd if given to the at risk elderly it's like 20% of that. So it seems like a good deal.