To misread a scientific paper you have to actually read it. Data analysis is a difficult field, and there are a number of studies where the data presented tells

To misread a scientific paper you have to actually read it. Data analysis is a difficult field, and there are a number of studies where the data presented tells a completely different story than the scientists presenting it. Science is political and scientists are fallible. Confirmation bias isn't a plebian problem. Reading for your own understanding and asking questions is a necessary part of both scientific accountability and personal growth! And, hearteningly, we see that OP has edited his comment to reflect the knowledge you passed along and has a better understanding of the situation. Inquiry at work.