3 ms·

8k AND 120fps. I think the proposal is 8K@60, 4K@120.

• exdsq 7y ago
  Ah... still, 8k@60 is exciting.
  • skohan 7y ago
    How big does a display have to be for 8k to be meaningful? It seems like you hit a point of diminishing returns with resolution: in terms of resource requirements (GPU, VRAM etc.) the cost goes up parabolically, and beyond a certain point it seems really hard to tell the difference.
    • saberience 7y ago
      It has to be huge... From: http://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/ http://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/ "What the chart shows is that, for a 84-inch screen, 4k resolution isn’t fully apparent until you are at least 5.5 feet or closer to the screen. For a “tiny” 55-inch screen, you’ll need to be 3.5 feet or closer. Needless to say, most consumers aren’t going to sit close enough to see any of extra resolution 4k offers, much less 8k."