3 ms·
8k at 120fps is an exciting prospect. I just looked and you can buy Samsung TVs that are 8k for £2000. By Christmas these might even hit an affordable price amo
by exdsq 7y ago
8k at 120fps is an exciting prospect. I just looked and you can buy Samsung TVs that are 8k for £2000. By Christmas these might even hit an affordable price amount.
- crehn 7y agoI'm still waiting for console games to be 1080p @ 60 FPS.
- Koshkin 7y agoI still wish I didn’t see polygons instead of circles.
- corysama 7y ago8k AND 120fps. I think the proposal is 8K@60, 4K@120.
- exdsq 7y agoAh... still, 8k@60 is exciting.
- skohan 7y agoHow big does a display have to be for 8k to be meaningful? It seems like you hit a point of diminishing returns with resolution: in terms of resource requirements (GPU, VRAM etc.) the cost goes up parabolically, and beyond a certain point it seems really hard to tell the difference.
- saberience 7y agoIt has to be huge... From: http://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/ http://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/ "What the chart shows is that, for a 84-inch screen, 4k resolution isn’t fully apparent until you are at least 5.5 feet or closer to the screen. For a “tiny” 55-inch screen, you’ll need to be 3.5 feet or closer. Needless to say, most consumers aren’t going to sit close enough to see any of extra resolution 4k offers, much less 8k."
- saberience 7y agoNo one (almost) has a TV which is big enough for 8K to be noticable unless you're 1 foot away from the screen. For an 84-inch screen, 4k resolution isn’t fully apparent until you are at least 5.5 feet or closer to the screen. For a “tiny” 55-inch screen, you’ll need to be 3.5 feet or closer. Needless to say, most consumers aren’t going to sit close enough to see any of the extra resolution 4k offers, much less 8k. http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html