5 ms·
Direct link http://www.concentrichron.com/ http://www.concentrichron.com/
by delvinj 7y ago
Direct link http://www.concentrichron.com/ http://www.concentrichron.com/
- adventured 7y agoIt's quite impressive, beautiful and smooth in motion. I have to second what someone else said, it could be made into an amazing wall clock (and even a small desk unit). There is a lot that could be optionally (settings) done to manipulate its aesthetic qualities in various directions to match personal preferences, times of day, events, and so on.
- arethuza 7y agoWould be cool to replace the years with "Year in Decade", "Decade in Century", "Century in Millennium".....
- elefantastisch 7y agoOr maybe just have year go from 00-99 and repeat as people commonly do anyway. Current implementation of year definitely doesn't make sense because it doesn't cycle.
- thebiss 7y agoI have the complete OPPOSITE experience: the motion is jerky and inconsistent, like the seconds are struggling then catch up. (Firefox 74 on Windows 10 18363)
- stan_rogers 7y agoI'm good with the same browser and OS, machine's an i3 7100 with 8GB RAM using the CPU's graphics, so nothing special at all.
- gnabgib 7y agoConcur. Since someone described it as 'beautiful and smooth' I opened it in Chrome.. beautiful and smooth (80% of the time). Since it's "just" SVG transforms perhaps this is a firefox:chrome difference (that said, I've built SVG transforms that run fine on both). It does invent the universe 31.25 times/second.. perhaps there's some JS optimizations we can do. [Update: basically smooth in IE11 too]
- thebiss 7y agoFixed. In Firefox, verify the GPU is enabled in `about:support`. In this case, I had to reset `layers.acceleration.force-enabled=true`.