4 ms·
This is a pedantic word splitting argument. The relevant measure is number of people infected no the number we happen to know for sure because we finally got ar
by digitaltrees 7y ago
This is a pedantic word splitting argument. The relevant measure is number of people infected no the number we happen to know for sure because we finally got around to testing. If we had South Korea’s level of testing then maybe your argument would warrant breath behind words, under the current circumstances save your breath.
- Supermancho 7y ago> This is a pedantic word splitting argument. No, it's a correction. >> > Also 3000 confirmed cases does not mean 3000 actual infections. This statement is factually incorrect. > The relevant measure is number of people infected no the number we happen to know for sure because we finally got around to testing That is irrelevant to the response I gave. It seems to be a popular interest today, in trying to clarify a concept, which is unrelated. I am done engaging with this derail.