2 ms·
I've not read tfa (because of the pay wall) - but don't we have third or fourth generation micro reactors already in submarines, ice breakers and hangar ships?
by e12e 7y ago
I've not read tfa (because of the pay wall) - but don't we have third or fourth generation micro reactors already in submarines, ice breakers and hangar ships? Obviously there's going to be a lot of water available for those... But is much research really needed to repurpose one as a generator?
- andrewl 7y agoFrom the article: The idea of small reactors is as old as nuclear power itself. In July 1951, five months before a reactor in Idaho became the first in the world to produce usable electricity through fission, America began building USS Nautilus, a nuclear-powered submarine. In the 1960s and 1970s small reactors powered bases in Alaska and Greenland, a radar facility in Wyoming, a research station in Antarctica and—from a cargo ship—the Panama Canal Zone. America still uses nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft-carriers. But land-based mini-reactors proved unreliable and expensive and have fallen out of favour. I was thinking the same thing you suggested, that maybe the basically unlimited supply of water for cooling made the ocean-going reactors feasible. Other than that, I'd think a mostly stationary reactor would be simpler to deal with than a ship-based one.