3 ms·
It's only a cop-out if you try to use it to explain the origin of life in general, not just on Earth. Life arose very quickly on Earth, almost as soon as it wa
by svachalek 7y ago
It's only a cop-out if you try to use it to explain the origin of life in general, not just on Earth.
Life arose very quickly on Earth, almost as soon as it was capable of surviving, so it raises the interesting question: were we just lucky, or is it easy to spawn life, or did it come from elsewhere? The answer creates very different pictures for what Earth-like planets elsewhere in the galaxy actually look like.
- JoeAltmaier 7y agoI'm always confused by that. So there's only one form of life possible? Otherwise life may have arisen before, been wiped out when Earth changed, and life arose again. We may be just the latest in a long series of life forms.
- qubex 7y agoGood point. It might be that the kind of life that arises on a planet depends on what it is bombarded with and which of those various candidate life-forms ‘takes’ on the specific environment.
- dekhn 7y agotheoretically possible but there is no evidence to suggest this. Weighing the various hypotheses, most people would suggest the "simpler" (fewer wipeout/arise events) hypothesis, given the assumption that life arising is considered very rare.
- JoeAltmaier 7y agoBecause the earth remade itself several times. Any previous life would have surely been erased. The assertion was that life arose just once. That's hard to prove.