3 ms·
They are running Node with only one worker and are instead tuning the DB connection pool in that one worker... So the whole benchmark is bogus.
by winrid 7y ago
They are running Node with only one worker and are instead tuning the DB connection pool in that one worker... So the whole benchmark is bogus.
- jasondclinton 7y agoAuthor addressed this on a Reddit comment thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/fbu5tt/expressjs_vs_actixweb_performance_and_running/fj6lqlq/ https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/fbu5tt/expressjs_vs_a... . The results aren't significantly different; Rust is still very much more efficient than NodeJS especially when considering memory utilization (and the hosting costs associated with that memory footprint).
- winrid 7y agoI really don't think the results would be significantly different. I tried to make changes and run his benchmarks, however the DB seeding is in Rust and it fails to compile on my machine....