9 ms·
Physicists grab individual atoms in groundbreaking experiment
- pochamago 7y agoI don't understand why it takes at least three atoms to form a molecule. In a cloud of hydrogen atoms, what is the third one doing in the production of h2?
- danbruc 7y agoI don't know the answer but I could imagine that it works like a kind of catalyst.
- amelius 7y agoLayman's guess. It probably has to do with conservation of energy and momentum. To form a molecule, you have to change the energy state of the electrons in both atoms, and in order to do so you have to respect the conservation laws, so I guess it takes a third atom to absorb/provide the required amounts of energy or momentum.
- mokus 7y agoI think this is correct, and that a good illustration is planetary orbits - 2 bodies alone can never collide if they didn’t start out in intersecting trajectories. They need a third to perturb their movements or they will just keep orbiting the same way forever.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- dntbnmpls 7y agoThere was a discussion a few days ago which had excellent comments and links explaining why you need at least 3 atoms to form a molecule. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22390546 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22390546
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Misdicorl 7y agoThe other response discussing conservation of energy and momentum is basically correct. However, the third particle doesn't need to be an atom! Emitting a photon with the right energy and spin will also suffice. Typically the transition rates via photon are extremely low, but they can be intentionally triggered with other photons. This yields the incredibly useful tool called photo-association to create molecules from cold atoms.
- myblake 7y agoYeah, I was confused too, there’s plenty of molecules made up of two atoms. Sounds like the guess from other commenters about conservation of energy and momentum are most likely to be correct!
- oceanghost 7y agoOne step closer to us getting our matter compiler!
- z3t4 7y agoAble to 3d print anything, including food. Pirating dishes.
- gentleman11 7y agoHypothetically, in 200 years: will it require more or less energy to 3D print daily items than to build it?
- jackyinger 7y agoI don’t want to be a jerk, but many material processes that have enabled us to make better performing materials has been directly related to investing more energy into a raw material. Take for example, iron vs. steel, cast vs forged, wood vs. carbon fiber. So I will be surprised if the future is a huge departure from history.
- Razengan 7y agoThe internet vs. books and newspapers, and so on.. Technological progress isn't linear.
- suifbwish 7y agoYou wouldn’t print a purse..
- eternalny1 7y ago3-D printing materials like gold would destroy the world economy, that should get interesting.
- basementcat 7y agoWhy would a cheaper way to produce gold destroy the world economy? Aluminum was more valuable than gold before the Hall–Héroult process. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_aluminium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_aluminium