4 ms·
I think the argument extends to potential need to draft general population in times of need. You want to draft healthy people.
by forkerenok 7y ago
I think the argument extends to potential need to draft general population in times of need. You want to draft healthy people.
- chii 7y agothe argument doesn't work, because the assumption is that you have a large, but unhealthy population. But such a population is unable to sustain itself in the first place! If a country is doing fine (production wise), then there must be way more healthy, able-bodied people than sick people. The draft will just target those able-bodied people. And then there's the new style of war these days - drones, remote weapons and nukes. It either comes down to a small skirmish against brown people with little more than an AK47, or it's nuke time. i don't see war going any other direction.
- simonh 7y agoIt’s not purely a practical argument, though it has a strong practical component, to me it’s also a moral one. We expect loyalty and patriotism from our people. If we owe loyalty to our country and each other, I believe that carries obligations. I’m no socialist, I’m a true believer in the individual freedoms and liberties at the heart of capitalism. Free enterprise is the most powerful force in human society, and it is generally a force for good. I suppose where I part ways with American style conservatives is my attitude to government. To me, in a democracy we are the government. It’s not an external force, it’s something we all carry responsibility for, and can be a vehicle through which we meet our mutual responsibilities, and to me that’s tied to my sense of patriotic duty. I know America has a much stronger sense of individualism and personal autonomy. I don’t want to malign that or trivialise it, there are good historical reasons for it. It’s just that over here in the UK we learned different historical lessons for different reasons.