But that's why the quote was included. Who are you arguing with? Newspapers do this sort of thing all the time. If some source used the phrase "latest Obama

But that's why the quote was included. Who are you arguing with? Newspapers do this sort of thing all the time. If some source used the phrase "latest Obama atrocity" the NY Times would never use that phrase--unless they framed it in a way to destroy the person making the quote. I don't get upset about this. It's just how journalism is.