3 ms·

I'm not sure about that. Looking at this system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCWL0XF_f8Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCWL0XF_f8Y it is disconcerting how

I'm not sure about that. Looking at this system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCWL0XF_f8Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCWL0XF_f8Y it is disconcerting how people pop in and out of view. A human could see a group of kids looking in the direction of the street at someone occluded from view and realize the possiblity of a child dashing out onto the street well in advance. The self-driving car would have to detect, classify and react after the child comes into view. It is this kind of common sense AI that we cannot engineer our way out. A couple days ago there was a viral post about how self-driving cars react to a 35 mph sign vandalized to look like 85 mph. A human would know that the sign is wrong - the self driving car would need this 'use case' programmed in - maybe have location based speed limits programmed in.

seanmcdirmid 7y ago
I think you have way too much faith in human-based image tracking, and their ability to interpolate situations while listening to the radio. As for https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8021567/Tesla-cars-tricked-accelerating-85-MPH-35-MPH-zone-using-just-strip-tape.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8021567/Tesl... Reading the article: > ‘It is worth noting that this is seemingly only possible on the first implementation of TACC when the driver double taps the lever, engaging TACC.’ It isn't a strict self driving situation, but makes for great click bait. I can't imagine that this isn't an easy fix (Tesla's are also easy to update collectively via software update, try doing that to human beings).