It is highly unlikely that the CEO did it all himself. It is far more likely that there were dozens if not hundreds of people that actively and willingly parti

It is highly unlikely that the CEO did it all himself. It is far more likely that there were dozens if not hundreds of people that actively and willingly participated in it. Were those people terminated? That's the real question. I'm, frankly, shocked that it is presumed that by replacing a CEO rather than replacing everyone who thought going after Susan was "just doing their job, not a big deal, no need to have a boss sign off on it" is considered to be acceptable.