4 ms·
Well I just launched fastcomments.com which you could use :p
by winrid 7y ago
Well I just launched fastcomments.com which you could use :p
- kohtatsu 7y agohttps://fastcomments.com/ https://fastcomments.com/ I appreciate the pricing~
- winrid 7y agoThanks. HN helped with it! :)
- wtmt 7y agoIt isn’t clear to me what the individual tier allows, except for the pageview restriction. There is no FAQ or Support link on the homepage. Is it one domain where all sub domains can have comments enabled? Or is it one subdomain in a domain? Or is it all (disparate) domains owned by an individual?
- winrid 7y agoYeah right now you have to have an account, then you have direct access to customer support via the UI. A FAQ page I should put together, that's correct. Your questions: 1. The tiers differ in pageview restrictions and developer support access. The highest tier provides migration support for the platforms that don't have automated migrations today (you can import from Disqus, Commento, and a couple others). 2. Right now domains are unlimited and validated at TLD. When you sign up just enter the sites you want to use like.com, this.org. For example, I dog-feed it on my blog at blog.winricklabs.com, but I only have winricklabs.com on my account.
- Cephalopterus 7y agoAre there any plans to add a free tier without support or migration for say, less than 100k views a month? The pricing seems pretty neat if you're closer to the limit of the pricing ie one million page views but if you're at the other end of the spectrum then it's significantly better to go with a free solution
- JonoBB 7y agoFor the sake of clarity, if I have 2 domains, is it $4.99 per domain, or can both domains come under a single $4.99 charge?
- winrid 7y agoBoth as a single charge.
- sandGorgon 7y agoDo you have a react component for this ?
- winrid 7y agoYou mean as a wrapper? I'm not familiar with react as an Angular guy, but do you need one - could you plop the HTML into the page? All the client side script does is insert an iframe and control its size. I'll look into making a React component.
- sandGorgon 7y agoreact does not play well with non-react javascript
- speedplane 7y ago> react does not play well with non-react javascript I'm work on a somewhat older project (circa 2015) that started without react, and have also found that to be the case. End-all-be-all web frameworks seem to be the rage now, but I'd prefer to see a solid library of micro-frameworks that can be stitched together (like jquery plugins, but better). Also, the idea of a web server transferring over a huge javascript library and app just to load a single page seems wrong. There has to be a better way, a better amalgamation between server and client.
- sandGorgon 7y agoto be fair, the problem seems to be in the jquery side. It was not built to play well with others. Also React fundamentally assumes it is the only one modifying the DOM through its virtual dom. If something else changes the DOM (like jquery), then React falls through.
- winrid 7y agoI won't be doing that! Offering a full react version.
- ivanhoe 7y agoWhat happens if you shut down the service, are there any guarantees on availability? How can I export my data and could I import it somewhere else reasonably easy?
- winrid 7y agoYou have full access to your data via the UI (csv exports all db fields).