3 ms·

The images are somewhat closer to abstract "composition" pieces, which are literally studies on visual composition: https://www.google.com/search?q=composition

by esjeon 7y ago

The images are somewhat closer to abstract "composition" pieces, which are literally studies on visual composition: https://www.google.com/search?q=composition+abstract+paintings&tbm=isch https://www.google.com/search?q=composition+abstract+paintin... I think this is quite expected, since ANN constructs its own view on stuffs, which is basically deconstruction of images into local components, like local color relation and sub-patterns. Global composition and shapes will be destroyed in favor of local composition, which is pretty much what many modern abstract paintings were after. While ANN can mass-produced stuffs like this, that doesn't mean it's gonna replace artists. It's gonna be the opposite: if artists learn through AIs, each of which trained on different sets of data (which can overlap), we will be able to see works in a different level. It's like go players study AlphaGo for new principles that humankind have missed.

joe_the_user 7y ago
Thanks for the reference! I think you've reminded of the vocabulary needed to express my impression of the images. IE, That's definitely how the images feel - just texture and composition. The thing is that I think that art involves using texture to "say" something. The artist puts combines represent of the physical world with reference to previous artists and images with composition. Some artists stress one or the other of these things - so that, yeah, a pure composition painting can definitely be "good enough to be in a museum". But a stream of painting like this definitely doesn't feel a museum or art as a whole.