4 ms·
I don't see the problem at all here. Can someone tell me what the outrage is all about. Suppose DNC didn't draw up such a contract. The company developed a pro
by sriram_malhar 7y ago
I don't see the problem at all here. Can someone tell me what the outrage is all about.
Suppose DNC didn't draw up such a contract. The company developed a product under tight wraps, its internals unknown to anyone else. All the n-1 candidates who didn't win would scream about transparency and vote rigging. The voting history of everyone on that dev team would likely be dredged up by someone or the other.
The DNC did the right thing. It is not to say that they don't find devious ways of promoting an inside candidate, but I think that in this case they had no other choice.
- AndrewBissell 7y agoThe problem is, the fact that they had oversight and input into the production of such an absolute disaster of an app (meant for such a crucial vote as the Iowa caucus) means the people responsible should be summarily fired and replaced.
- sriram_malhar 7y agoI agree. But incompetence and shadowy machinations are two different things. The DNC may well have both, but this episode doesn't prove the latter.