3 ms·

also death counts? prediction: 808 reported: 811 -- sources: EN: https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-outbreak-has-killed-more-people-than-sars-1158122

also death counts? prediction: 808 reported: 811 -- sources: EN: https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-outbreak-has-killed-more-people-than-sars-11581226253 https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-outbreak-has-killed... probably the original: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yjb/s7860/202002/4f28ab5ca87d42d284833df3ccc8d45a.shtml http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yjb/s7860/202002/4f28ab5ca87d42d284833...

SpicyLemonZest 7y ago
This is data for 2/8, where the redditor’s death count prediction was 721.
- ryanwaggoner 7y ago
  I think their prediction is for report date. Between reporting lag and time zone differences, I wouldn’t discount this if it’s tracking the trend lines but just off by a day.
- anotheryou 7y ago
  2/8 at 12pm, published 2/9 I aggregated the numbers for fatalities: date published | reported (count as of 24:00 the previous day) | predicted 2/5 | 490 | 489 2/6 | 563 | 561 2/7 | 636 | 639 2/8 | 722 | 721 2/9 | 811 | 808 2/10 | ___ | 900 2/11 | ___ | 997 so far +/- 3 difference
  - anotheryou 7y ago
    date published | reported (count as of 24:00 the previous day) | predicted 2/5 | 490 | 489 2/6 | 563 | 561 2/7 | 636 | 639 2/8 | 722 | 721 2/9 | 811 | 808 2/10 | 908 | 900 2/11 | ___ | 997
    - anotheryou 7y ago
      date published | reported (count as of 24:00 the previous day) | predicted 2/5 | 490 | 489 2/6 | 563 | 561 2/7 | 636 | 639 2/8 | 722 | 721 2/9 | 811 | 808 2/10 | 908 | 900 2/11 |1016 | 997