4 ms·
Web platform primitives for foldable devices
- baybal2 7y agoMicrosoft, please don't expand the standard on your own. Don't add yet another <blink> tag
- wffurr 7y agoIt's a proposal. And if it gets built will be in Chromium. The usual lifecycle for these things now is propose, implement, gather data from usage experiments, refine, and standardize. There will also be statements for or against from the other browser vendors and interested parties.
- baybal2 7y agoI don't need a "standard" that will only work on a gimmick Microsoft device. So, everyone, please help us bury it.
- SahAssar 7y agoThis is meant to work with other android devices too. It explicitly says so in the introduction. Microsoft has actually contributed quite a lot to web standards over the years.
- wffurr 7y agoPlenty of OEMs have made and are making multi screen devices. Some of them have even been market successes (Nintendo DS?).
- Dylan16807 7y agoWhat's wrong with blink? Standardization-wise, it was just fine.
- admax88q 7y agoThe continual expansion of web standards for one off devices and use cases only ensures that only Google can afford to build a browser.