3 ms·
Nonsense. "Environmentalists" (a crude & politically inactive umbrella term) can't even get nations to do the minimum necessary for long-term survival (stop cat
by crispinb 7y ago
Nonsense. "Environmentalists" (a crude & politically inactive umbrella term) can't even get nations to do the minimum necessary for long-term survival (stop catastrophic rates of wetland & forest destruction even in wealthy nations, reduce CO2 emissions, etc, etc, etc). Greens (for example) hardly get elected anywhere outside of a couple of European nations.
It is true there is public resistance to nuclear power, almost everywhere. And the very same citizenries which don't want nuclear power also vote against action on climate change, for the corporatacracy, & for the generalised sacrifice of the biosphere for fake 'economic growth'.
People don't want nuclear power because they are scared of it being near them (rightly or wrongly). This has zip to do with environmentalism.
- hurricanetc 7y agoNonsense. Fear or nuclear is a result of decades of lobbying and fear mongering by anti nuclear environmentalists.
- FooHentai 7y agoNothing to do with them there accidents, eh.
- crispinb 7y agoIt's a witch!
- imtringued 7y agoThere also were decades of lobbying and mismanagement that made the fear mongering possible. Nuclear has a bad reputation because it deserves one.