3 ms·
Interesting. The graphs on that website do not agree with the ones on Wikipedia. For example, for coal in 2016 Wikipedia says ~220 TWh but Strom says ~135 TWh.
by fiter 7y ago
Interesting. The graphs on that website do not agree with the ones on Wikipedia. For example, for coal in 2016 Wikipedia says ~220 TWh but Strom says ~135 TWh.
EDIT: I see my mistake. I did not add both brown (~135 TWh) and black coal (~100 TWh) together (surprised to see those broken out, but it's a valid difference). In that case, the numbers still do not agree, but at least they are comparable.
[0] https://strom-report.de/strom/#stromerzeugung-deutschland-2017-detail https://strom-report.de/strom/#stromerzeugung-deutschland-20...
- lispm 7y agoI don't see it. Strom-report says for 2016: 150 TWh Braunkohle + 110 TWh Steinkohle. For electricity production. > surprised to see those broken out Braunkohle has domestic production, Steinkohle no longer.
- xxgreg 7y agoAnother chart... Note some stats are percentage of consumption, others are percentage of generation. These differ due to imports and exports. https://www.cleanenergywire.org/sites/default/files/styles/gallery_image/public/paragraphs/images/fig2a-gross-power-production-germany-1990-2019-source.png?itok=gfWUQdcp https://www.cleanenergywire.org/sites/default/files/styles/g...
- imtringued 7y agoBlack coal is basically dead while brown coal might survive economically without carbon pricing.