These electronics are marketed to perform better than the one before. They shows big numbers flaunting how the thing zips, has more cores, whatever. Therefore,

These electronics are marketed to perform better than the one before. They shows big numbers flaunting how the thing zips, has more cores, whatever. Therefore, it makes sense that patches curving or throttle performance are made transparent to the consumer. If anything, these patches should ask for permission from the user and toggle-able via settings. Performance was promised. If the "wear and tear" argument of batteries aging is true, they should be made replaceable. If an item is subject to wear and tear - it should be serviceable, not soldered. It would be pretty ridiculous to have a firmware update for a car that makes it use more gas, in hopes they'll buy a new one. Especially if it was snuck in. Maybe we need a regulatory bureaucracy to audit software patches and wire refunds when performance advertised degrades. Perhaps the cost of the electronic should be held in escrow by the regulatory authority, made into a security for the model of the unit, and only vest to Apple/Lenovo/etc based on a timespan. That escrow can subsidize the cost of a $1000 soldered logic board replacement on their own balance/tab. Or they could just make the units serviceable from the outset. The path of least resistance. That way, it incentivizes honesty and success for businesses like Apple by tying their products to sustainability. Them being all about the environment: https://www.apple.com/environment/ https://www.apple.com/environment/.