3 ms·
hadn't heard that as the reason... In 2005, the National Academies of Sciences published a pamphlet that expressed the viewpoint that “climate change” was a mo
by sharkmerry 7y ago
hadn't heard that as the reason...
In 2005, the National Academies of Sciences published a pamphlet that expressed the viewpoint that “climate change” was a more scientifically comprehensive description of what was happening to the planet. “The phrase ‘climate change’ is growing in preferred use to ‘global warming’ because it helps convey that there are changes in addition to rising temperatures,” it said.[1]
1-https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2018/01/29/debunking-the-claim-they-changed-global-warming-to-climate-change-because-its-cooling/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/...
- occams-razor 7y agoSo a reasonable scientific hypothesis is one that describes “change” in a problem space with close to infinite variables? Got it. The optics of the naming of a hypothesis is counter to the philosophy at the heart scientific inquiry.