3 ms·
I found the headline misleading - Uber didn't permanently block the drivers, it temporarily suspended them from driving. Uber also temporarily suspended all the
by burlesona 7y ago
I found the headline misleading - Uber didn't permanently block the drivers, it temporarily suspended them from driving. Uber also temporarily suspended all the people who had been in the car that day. They also notified all these folks and sent them info on health providers.
That actually sounds pretty prudent and helpful to me. If I were one of those 240 passengers, I'd be a little upset to find out I'd been in a car after someone carrying the virus, but grateful to know I'd been exposed. Then if I started getting symptoms, instead of thinking "well, there's no corona virus in Mexico, it's a cold, I'll just sleep it off," I'd go in for treatment right away.
I realize it sucks for the drivers who are counting on driving income, but WOW is an Uber driver an effective patient-zero, just two cars exposed meant 240 people exposed! Can you imagine if Uber didn't intervene after it knew about the exposure? Future headline: thousands infected in Mexico after Uber fails to quarantine exposed drivers.
- tinus_hn 7y agoThey could offer some kind of compensation for drivers they block that did nothing wrong.
- baobabKoodaa 7y agoSure, they could, but why would a mafia corporation like Uber do that?
- radu_floricica 7y agoBecause it encourages uber drivers to avoid reporting. On the other hand, compensating encourages false reporting. Incentives are complicated...