4 ms·
The thing is, I see no way to have full self driving without AGI. And I don't think humanity is anywhere close to developing AGI. Without AGI you can have level
by axguscbklp 7y ago
The thing is, I see no way to have full self driving without AGI. And I don't think humanity is anywhere close to developing AGI. Without AGI you can have level 4++ self driving, maybe, but not level 5.
- xkjkls 7y agoHow much difference does 4++ vs 5 make for the predicted consequences of self-driving cars though? That's the important thing.
- axguscbklp 7y agoI would say that I would feel comfortable falling asleep in a 5 while it is driving nontrivial distance and/or road conditions, but I would not feel comfortable doing so in a 4++.
- Dylan16807 7y agoWhy? Plain old 4 is supposed to be the "safe to sleep" level.
- xkjkls 7y agoHow often do you have drives when you need to fall asleep though?
- rifung 7y ago> The thing is, I see no way to have full self driving without AGI. Why? AGI seems like a significantly harder problem than self driving cars (itself a hard problem admittedly). What I personally think will happen is we'll meet somewhere in the middle: we can redesign roads/cars to make solving the problem of self driving easier.
- axguscbklp 7y agoBecause of all the edge cases that humans can handle a good amount of the time because we have a lot of intelligence compared to any computer. But I agree with you that if we meet in the middle, that could actually work well.