3 ms·
I don't think the OP was suggesting we do nothing, but rather we should ground our fundamentals in the scientific method. We do not have another planet Earth to
by shusson 7y ago
I don't think the OP was suggesting we do nothing, but rather we should ground our fundamentals in the scientific method. We do not have another planet Earth to test climate change on. That doesn't mean we should do nothing, but we should also understand our limits in predicting a system like our planet Earth.
- admax88q 7y agoOP is arguing that the models are likely to overestimate warming/damage. The logical conclusion from there is that the damage isnt as bad as predicted and therefore less action needs to be taken.
- cbHXBY1D 7y agoAnd this is truly textbook HN behavior when it comes to climate change. You see it over and over.
- imtringued 7y agoThat would only matter if you were taking any action at all. When you're doing nothing you simply don't care.