3 ms·
Yes, that would be hilarious. Instead of half of the worlds population being wiped out by nukes, we'd be wiped out by chemical weapons, airstrikes, and ground
by tw04 7y ago
Yes, that would be hilarious. Instead of half of the worlds population being wiped out by nukes, we'd be wiped out by chemical weapons, airstrikes, and ground warfare.
- ClumsyPilot 7y agoAlternative scenario: The imbeciles are lynched in the street by angry crowds, many enquiries follow, life continues as normal. I know anyone alive today, not suffering from a mental illness, that would accept their leaders starting a global nuclear war.
- tw04 7y agoI would wager roughly 49% of the American voting public would be fine with Trump starting a Nuclear war. They didn't bat an eye at him assassinating an Iranian general. Or praising leaders like Kim in North Korea. They don't mind his rampant corruption to date or abuses of power. Mind you, that's not a majority of the actual population given how low voter turnout is, but that's enough to be really scary.
- ClumsyPilot 7y agoI think the number is far too high, in my experience partisan people sober up remarkably quickly once their ass is on the line.
- DennisP 7y agoNone of those are anywhere near as destructive as thermonuclear weapons.