5 ms·
> Instead of improving the pages (which any self-respecting graduate student could do over a cup of tea and a scone) you just erased them. Unilaterally. Well,
by j_baker 16y ago
> Instead of improving the pages (which any self-respecting graduate student could do over a cup of tea and a scone) you just erased them. Unilaterally.
Well, technically he and an admin deleted them unilaterally. Regardless, you're correct. The focus should be on building knowledge, not tearing it down.
- namdnay 16y agoUnilaterally? Anyone can !vote on an AFD.
- maximilianburke 16y agoAnyone can vote on whether or not an article should be deleted but how many people actually do? I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of Wikipedia users don't know, and don't care, about Wikipedia politics. If something is in the process of being deleted that I don't know about then I can't vote on whether or not I want it to be kept around. Wikipedia is great for jumping from link-to-link to find out new things and if the content is being deleted it's that much harder to learn. I didn't even know about the programming language Nemerle before and now the article is gone. Knowledge shouldn't be voted on.
- cabalamat 16y agoIt isn't a vote. ("Articles for deletion" used to be called "votes for deletion", when it was a voting-based system, but that was some time ago).
- namdnay 16y ago> I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of Wikipedia users don't know, and don't care, about Wikipedia politics If they don't care about the "politics", they shouldn't complain if the direction chosen by the project does not suit them.
- AndyKelley 16y agoI should make a tool that periodically scans the articles for deletion and always votes NO. I could allow anyone else to use this tool as well. Then I think the real voice of the Internet would show that we don't support deletionism!
- pbhjpbhj 16y agoVoting against deletion means nothing without some reasoning.