5 ms·
To be honest, that sounds like the reasonable and fair thing to do when a foreign company is violating your laws on the internet. First tell them to stop, then
by lopmotr 7y ago
To be honest, that sounds like the reasonable and fair thing to do when a foreign company is violating your laws on the internet. First tell them to stop, then block them. Not every country has this "safe harbor" concept that the US does, so you may have to take responsibility for the content you host if you want access to those markets.
- kitteh 7y agoIt'd be better if they were transparent about it and you could see these actions clearly instead of having to glean it from a looking glass or from in country probes.
- analognoise 7y agoGetting direct contact about the issue directly seems very transparent to me? If you just suddenly disappeared without a note, that's one thing. "Please stop action X occurring on your network" sounds very clear and direct.
- kitteh 7y agoI meant why doesn't the government publish a list of IPs blocked, when it started and the reason why. Edit: I see I'm getting downvoted here but I want to explain why I am passionate about this topic. As someone who supports network infrastructure and it's operation I'm on the hook to find out why x can't talk to y. It's a challenge when dealing with ISP/country level blocks or packet manipulation. Proving that this is something deliberate versus a legitimate broken thing is a process to go through. Not being able to tell a customer why is not a great story. Different countries have different techniques for this and over time you learn them. Seeing your packets in a traceroute going to a hop that has a DNS PTR record that says "DPI" in the name is a nice heads up to an operator to give you that sort of indication of what you're dealing with. I am aware that basically no country publishes such blocks today and ISPs that are forced to implement such blocks are usually instructed to not tell you anything about it (sometimes off the record, if you're lucky).
- walrus01 7y agoI'm really disappointed when I see this sort of response. Somebody in a foreign country is hosting content on their own servers that offends you, or violates one of your local laws, so your best possible response is to null route an entire block of their IP space? Please tell us which ASNs you do network engineering for...
- AdamJacobMuller 7y ago> hosting content on their own servers that offends you It's not about offense in the parent comment, it's about theft. I see this as a reasonable response, given no additional context.
- GuardianCaveman 7y agoYes but there is all of the collateral damage of other hosted sites who did nothing.
- AdamJacobMuller 7y agoWhich presumably impacts the hosting company's bottom line, encouraging them to remove the offending content.
- cft 7y agoWhen you steal something it means the owner doesn't have it anymore. How is this theft?
- mindslight 7y agoPushers of the paradigm of imaginary property like to misuse the word "theft" to make the plebs identify with their position.
- Lambdanaut 7y agoIn the same way that all abortions are murder.
- cft 7y agoI like it better than the EU way of threatening to sue companies that are outside of their jurisdictions. I am not a fan of this action, but due to virtue signalers here your comment will be downvoted even more.