5 ms·

The most important thing for developers is will they have the skills to get the next job or will they be working on technology that no one wants in a few years

by rb808 7y ago

The most important thing for developers is will they have the skills to get the next job or will they be working on technology that no one wants in a few years time. If FANG companies are hiring people with SPA, JS, Python experience it makes perfect sense to get rid of any technology no matter how well it is working.

sabana 7y ago
.NET is amazing and very popular right now. Why would anyone get rid of it?
- rb808 7y ago
  Agreed I like .NET I've modified the original to make it any generic technology that isn't hot in SV.
pjmlp 7y ago
Those are the same companies that 5 years down the line discover why all big corporations bet on .NET and Java when performance matters.
- dragonwriter 7y ago
  Big enterprises (corporations and government) have been betting on Java/.NET often without considering performance; they do it because the skills are widespread and the talent is cheap to hire (not necessary low salary, but easy to fill positions.) That's also why JS/Python is becoming attractive to them now.
  - pjmlp 7y ago
    They do when accounting sees the cloud renting costs to scale those js/python apps.
- code_sloth 7y ago
  "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", or so the industry said for decades. But IBM wasn't (always) the best, they were just safe bets. Until the world started changing and they weren't. .Net and Java have always been good enough. Even today they're good enough for many, many problems. I probably would not reach for .Net and Java if performance literally mattered.
  - marcosdumay 7y ago
    > I probably would not reach for .Net and Java if performance literally mattered. There are many tiers for performance mattering. It is quite possible, and common, for Python to be too slow while .Net is fast enough.
  - james_s_tayler 7y ago
    >"Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM" Now that I think about it, given this is no longer true, at some point it must have been the case that people started getting fired for buying IBM.

by rb808 7y ago

sabana 7y ago

.NET is amazing and very popular right now. Why would anyone get rid of it?

rb808 7y ago
Agreed I like .NET I've modified the original to make it any generic technology that isn't hot in SV.

pjmlp 7y ago

Those are the same companies that 5 years down the line discover why all big corporations bet on .NET and Java when performance matters.

dragonwriter 7y ago
Big enterprises (corporations and government) have been betting on Java/.NET often without considering performance; they do it because the skills are widespread and the talent is cheap to hire (not necessary low salary, but easy to fill positions.) That's also why JS/Python is becoming attractive to them now.
- pjmlp 7y ago
  They do when accounting sees the cloud renting costs to scale those js/python apps.
code_sloth 7y ago
"Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", or so the industry said for decades. But IBM wasn't (always) the best, they were just safe bets. Until the world started changing and they weren't. .Net and Java have always been good enough. Even today they're good enough for many, many problems. I probably would not reach for .Net and Java if performance literally mattered.
- marcosdumay 7y ago
  > I probably would not reach for .Net and Java if performance literally mattered. There are many tiers for performance mattering. It is quite possible, and common, for Python to be too slow while .Net is fast enough.
- james_s_tayler 7y ago
  >"Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM" Now that I think about it, given this is no longer true, at some point it must have been the case that people started getting fired for buying IBM.