3 ms·
Closest I can think of is tortious interference. They're interfering with a contract btw the restaurant and a third party, although the contract part could be t
by staticautomatic 7y ago
Closest I can think of is tortious interference. They're interfering with a contract btw the restaurant and a third party, although the contract part could be tricky.
- chii 7y agoit's a verbal contract between the restaurant and the patron. I dont it'd be that tricky to prove such a contract!
- staticautomatic 7y agoA "meeting of the minds" is generally a required element of a contract, and there obviously isn't one with respect to the price, even if that's because of the interference itself. Nothing is simple in litigation.