Controversial: Is this the same disease that leads to the love of Haskell by those particular zealots (more not all Haskell programmers) who write yet another

Controversial: Is this the same disease that leads to the love of Haskell by those particular zealots (more not all Haskell programmers) who write yet another monad tutorial to spread the word of the one truth without writing any useful programs? Seeing "ah this is sequencing, so i can abstract that..." And so on. Haskell gets you to higher and higher levels of abstraction in your programming but doesn't seem to guarantee you'll get a useful program at the end of it. (Yes there are useful Haskell programs, obviously. Just less of them than monad tutorials by at least an order of magnitude)